quantization schemas comparison
Q5_0 (Integer Quantization with Zero)
- Precision: 5 bits
- Range: -32 to 31
- Conversion formula:
f_i = ⌊f / 2^5⌋
- Characteristics:
- Simple and fast, but may lead to rounding errors.
- Suitable for applications where high precision is not required.
Q5_1 (Integer Quantization with One)
- Precision: 5 bits
- Range: -32 to 31
- Conversion formula:
f_i = ⌊(s + f) / 2^5⌋if s is positive;0otherwise (where s is the sign bit)
- Characteristics:
- Similar to Q5_0, but with a single-bit representation for the sign bit.
- Provides better accuracy than Q5_0.
Q5_K_S (Integer Quantization with Sign-Switched)
- Precision: 5 bits
- Range: -32 to 31
- Conversion formula:
f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^4)f) / 2^5⌋if s is positive;0otherwise (where s is the sign bit)
- Characteristics:
- Uses a sign-switched representation, which can lead to better accuracy.
- Suitable for applications where high precision is required.
Q5_K_M (Integer Quantization with K-Means)
- Precision: 5 bits
- Range: -32 to 31
- Conversion formula:
f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^4)f) / 2^5⌋if s is positive;0otherwise (where s is the sign bit)
- Characteristics:
- Uses K-Means clustering to determine the optimal quantization values for each weight.
- Provides better accuracy than Q5_K_S.
Q6_K (Integer Quantization with K-Means)
- Precision: 6 bits
- Range: -32 to 31
- Conversion formula:
f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^5)f) / 2^6⌋if s is positive;0otherwise (where s is the sign bit)
- Characteristics:
- Similar to Q5_K_M, but with a higher precision.
- Provides better accuracy than Q5_K_S.
Q8_0 (Integer Quantization with Zero)
- Precision: 8 bits
- Range: -128 to 127
- Conversion formula:
f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^7)f) / 2^8⌋if s is positive;0otherwise (where s is the sign bit)
- Characteristics:
- Simple and fast, but may lead to rounding errors.
- Suitable for applications where high precision is not required.
Comparison summary:
| Scheme | Precision (bits) | Range | Conversion Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q5_0 | 5 | -32 to 31 | f_i = ⌊f / 2^5⌋ |
| Q5_1 | 5 | -32 to 31 | f_i = ⌊(s + f) / 2^5⌋ if s is positive; 0 otherwise |
| Q5_K_S | 5 | -32 to 31 | f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^4)f) / 2^5⌋ if s is positive; 0 otherwise |
| Q5_K_M | 5 | -32 to 31 | f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^4)f) / 2^5⌋ if s is positive; 0 otherwise |
| Q6_K | 6 | -32 to 31 | f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^5)f) / 2^6⌋ if s is positive; 0 otherwise |
| Q8_0 | 8 | -128 to 127 | f_i = ⌊(s + (-2^7)f) / 2^8⌋ if s is positive; 0 otherwise |
When choosing between these schemes, consider the following factors:
- Accuracy: Q6_K and Q5_K_M provide better accuracy than Q5_0 and Q5_1.
- Memory efficiency: Q5_1 and Q5_K_S are more memory-efficient than Q5_0.
- Complexity: Q5_K_M and Q6_K require slightly more computation than the other schemes.
Ultimately, the choice of quantization scheme depends on the specific application requirements and trade-offs between accuracy, memory efficiency, and computational complexity.
FP16 ?
Here are some general guidelines:
- Use FP16 when:
- High precision is required.
- Memory usage is not a concern (FP16 requires more memory than Q6_K or Q8_0).
- Use Q6_K when:
- A good balance between accuracy and memory efficiency is desired.
- Computational complexity is not a major concern.
- Use Q8_0 when:
- High performance is required, and precision is not critical.
- Memory usage is a concern (Q8_0 requires less memory than Q6_K or FP16).